Re: [CR] Measuring bike frame angles

(Example: Framebuilding:Norris Lockley)

In-Reply-To: <4AD183E5.9010200@m-gineering.nl>
References: <COL121-W10D3471A2F437FFAF9E3A9BFCE0@phx.gbl> <COL121-W467501A1204F28205AA987BFCA0@phx.gbl> <4AD08CD9.1000603@oxford.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 06:12:38 -0400
From: "Ken Freeman" <kenfreeman096@gmail.com>
To: M-gineering <info@m-gineering.nl>
Cc: Rendezvous Classic <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: Re: [CR] Measuring bike frame angles


Why is that a problem? It's not common today, but so what?

On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 3:06 AM, M-gineering <info@m-gineering.nl> wrote:
> John Betmanis wrote:
>
>
>>> Dave Moulton just posted a couple of interesting articles about frame
>> angles and this very subject on his blog. Take a look at "The Evolution of
>> Frame Design" parts I and II here: http://tinyurl.com/y95tntg
>>
>>
> Interesting, only problem is that the picture he uses shows a bike with
> around 40mm of trail (T=14% x Rwheel according to autocad)
>
> --
> mvg
>
> Marten Gerritsen
> Kiel Windeweer
> Netherlands
> _______________________________________________
>

--
Ken Freeman
Ann Arbor, MI USA