Re: [CR] Facing and reaming

(Example: Books:Ron Kitching)

From: "Neil Foddering" <neilfoddering@hotmail.com>
To: <mrrabbit@mrrabbit.net>, <onetenth@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 09:20:31 +0000
In-Reply-To: <1257290991.4af0bcefc1dfb@www.mrrabbit.net>
References: <259181072.20091103104410@rogers.com> <F62E80D05B794DD7A6F64BE7E5D66CB3@ARSPC> <4AF0871D.1050301@aol.com>
Cc: Rendezvous Classic <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: Re: [CR] Facing and reaming


Is there any chance of leaving Dale to decide what's relevant to the CR list? I'm getting tired of opening what looks to be an interesting post, only to find post after post consisting of members squabbling over whether or not something is on-topic. I have better ways to spend my time than having to sift through a load of playground behaviour to find something relevant. Why do some members feel it necessary to try to catch others out doing something wrong? What are they looking to achieve?

Neil Foddering Weymouth, Dorset, England


> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:29:51 -0700
> From: mrrabbit@mrrabbit.net
> To: onetenth@earthlink.net
> CC: Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> Subject: Re: [CR] Facing and reaming
>
> Just as a friendly reminder to all...the OP:
>
> [Paste]
>
> Hi,
>
> When you build up an old frame, or change BB or headset - do you
> usually re-face (and in the case of headset, perhaps re-ream) the
> tubes? Or are those procedures only needed for new frames? Please
> share your experiences.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Dmitry Yaitskov,
> Toronto, Canada.
>
>
> [End Paste]
>
>
> Was the topic/focus:
>
> A. Whether or not a vintage frame requires re-facing when a headset is
> changed.
> B. Whether or not frames in general need to be re-faced when changing a
> headset.
>
> (Read the OP carefully...their wording...not mine.)
>
>
> I think honestly this get backs to that specific rule for CR where folks are
> asked to consider their post carefully before submitting in order to start out
> and hopefully stay ON-TOPIC - otherwise consider other more general purpose
> cycling websites.
>
>
> =8-)
>
> Robert Shackelford
> San Jose, CA USA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Quoting Andrew R Stewart <onetenth@earthlink.net>:
>
> > Robert- The tools I use and was referring to are very much on topic. The OP
> > did mention "an old frame".
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <mrrabbit@mrrabbit.net>
> > To: "verktyg" <verktyg@aol.com>
> > Cc: "Andrew R Stewart" <onetenth@earthlink.net>;
> > <Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 3:03 PM
> > Subject: Re: [CR] Facing and reaming
> >
> >
> > > Was this ever even ON-TOPIC?
> > >
> > > It appears from the beginning to be basically a general bicycle mechanics
> > > thread which is covered quite well by at least two other websites that
> > > have
> > > forums for bicycle mechanics for bike vintage and new bikes. Took a
> > > slight
> > > turn to ON-TOPIC for a post or two and then went OFF-TOPIC again.
> > >
> > > =8-)
> > >
> > > If this had been a topic from the beginning about taking a vintage frame
> > > and
> > > reaming it up to todays common diameters, etc. in order to fit newer
> > > headsets -
> > >
> > > then you wouldn't have heard from me...
> > >
> > > =8-)
> > >
> > >
> > > Robert Shackelford
> > > San Jose, CA USA
> >
> >
> >
> > Andrew R Stewart
> > Rochester, NY
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > PRIVACY WARNING: For auditing purposes, a copy of this message has been
> > saved in a permanent database.
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> PRIVACY WARNING: For auditing purposes, a copy of this message has been
> saved in a permanent database.