Re: [CR] unorthodox frame designs with no brand markings: a CR urbanlegend?

(Example: History)

From: "Andrew R Stewart" <onetenth@earthlink.net>
To: Peter Brueggeman <4peebee@peterbrueggeman.com>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <AFEFEEDBE5304FE6A6CF42DA54109AB5@AD.UCSD.EDU>
In-Reply-To:
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:46:19 -0500
Subject: Re: [CR] unorthodox frame designs with no brand markings: a CR urbanlegend?


Whether the story of unique frame design as an advertizing tool is urban legend or not, it's been around for a long time. I first heard it back in the 1970s.


----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Brueggeman <4peebee@peterbrueggeman.com>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 3:30 PM
Subject: [CR] unorthodox frame designs with no brand markings: a CR


urbanlegend?


> In reference to a Baines Flying Gate, Harvey Sachs said "...My guess is
> that this, like the "curly" stay Hetchins and the "Cantiflex" with
> "diadrant" (?) recurved forks was an effort to do almost anything to make
> your brand identifiable in races where no brand markings were allowed.
> ..."
>
> My unschooled understanding is that the use of unorthodox frame designs to
> make brands identifiable where no brand markings were allowed (in British
> racing) is a recurring CR urban legend, and there's been no documentation
> to back this up?
>
> I checked the CR Archive and couldn't find anything but it is a tough
> topic to keyword search.
>
> Peter
> ..........
> Peter Brueggeman
> La Jolla California USA
> 4peebee(at)peterbrueggeman.com
>
> _______________________________________________

Andrew R Stewart
Rochester, NY