Re: [CR] Rauler and Trek 700c v. 27 Data points

(Example: Framebuilders:Doug Fattic)

From: "Robert Troy" <>
To: <>
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 17:35:24 -0500
In-Reply-To: <>
Subject: Re: [CR] Rauler and Trek 700c v. 27 Data points

Greetings all,

To add a couple data points to the discussion:

My 1974(?) Rauler is built for 700c, and my 1987 Trek 520 (highest tourer in their line-up that year) was built for 27".

Happy Holidays,

Bob Troy, who is on his way out the door to a Boxing Day party in snowy Chicago, IL, USA

> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 11:25:15 -0800
> From: Kevin Kruger <>
> Subject: [CR] 700C vs. 27" wheel timeline = 27" on late 1970s Italian
> Rauler
> To: <>
> Message-ID: <>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> I found it interesting that my late 1970s Rauler was built to accept 27" wheels vs. 700C.? Just goes to show that you can't use a general wheel size rule for higher quality Italian, European, or English built frames/bikes from the 70s.
> Here's the Wool Jersey address to view photos of my Rauler complete with 27" wheels (Campy Record small flange hubs laced to Weimmann 27" concave rims):
> Speaking of 27" wheels, I am about to build a pair of correctly sized 27" wheels for my 1949 Hetchins Super Special, since that's what it originally had mounted and the frame was built to accept.
> Regards,
> Kevin Kruger - Grantville, PA