Re: [CR] NOS Paramount on ebay, wrong year .

(Example: Framebuilders:Doug Fattic)

From: "Emilio Bozzie" <emiliobozzi@hotmail.com>
To: <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>, <tedtrambley@gmail.com>, <viciouscycles@excite.com>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 20:31:23 -0700
In-Reply-To: <22596.5658.qm@web82206.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <20090509143110.17315@web004.roc2.bluetie.com>
Subject: Re: [CR] NOS Paramount on ebay, wrong year .


I had to take a look at this bike causing the hoopla, especially since the issue of ebay becoming more and more of a dodgy place to do business. At any rate when I see the bike I don't know didly about any timeline and have seen Brooks Pro saddles on early 60s Legnanos/Bianchi, etc.; however, the Gran Turisimo and "safety" levers were definately a product of the 70s.

In any case when we see the bike for what it presumably really is... a early 70s Paramount, is it a wild beast or what?

the safety levers, the boat anchor cleverly disguised as stem mounted shifters, the clinchers. Its a wonder why Schwinn just didn't put a solid steel Varsity fork on this bike! OK, time to stop beating up on the Americans. Do you recall when Schwinn was the unquestioned king of quality in US bikes? Looking at this rascal hunts the noggin when I think about that.

regards- Nels Cone Seattle WA


> Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 13:06:46 -0700
> From: jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net
> To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org; tedtrambley@gmail.com; viciouscycles@excite.com
> Subject: Re: [CR] NOS Paramount on ebay, wrong year .
>
>
> You're right, of course. The equipment is all wrong for 1967, per Chuck Schmidt's Campy Timeline. The 144 BCD triple crank was only just introduced in 1967, and I doubt Schwinn would have adopted it so quickly. The Superleggeri pedals were not introduced until 1968, and initially did not have black cages. The Campy Gran Tourismo was not introduced until 1970. I'm also not entirely sure Schwinn was using suicide levers in 1967. And finally I'm not 100% sure the Brooks Pro was available in 1967. It was introduced sometime in the 60's, but I think it may have been very late 60's.
>
> All that said, this bike is worth a lot more than the current $510 bid. Even if you don't believe the NOS claim, an early 70's all-chrome, all original (albeit not for 1967) Paramount in this kind of condition has been going for $1,000 or more for at least a decade now, and I don't expect the recession will have changed that. But the incorrect date does make one question the seller's reliability.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jerry Moos
> Big Spring, Texas, USA
>
>
> --- On Sat, 5/9/09, david <viciouscycles@excite.com> wrote:
>
> > From: david <viciouscycles@excite.com>
> > Subject: Re: [CR] NOS Paramount on ebay, wrong year .
> > To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org, tedtrambley@gmail.com
> > Date: Saturday, May 9, 2009, 1:31 PM
> > Any one have experiance with eBay seller
> > "Campyfred" ?
> >
> > They have a "NOS" Paramount listed as a 1967, by
> > the ser. # and equipment it is a 1972. I mentioned it to the
> > seller and got a rude reply "get a life"
> >
> > If I was un-aware and bid it as a 1967 (much rarer than a
> > '72) I would not be happy when a 1972 arrived.
> >
> > item # 170329784278..
> >
> > no relation to seller, thankfully.
> >
> > David Cowie
> > Oakland Oregon
> > USA
> >
> > 25 Paramount's and counting
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > Free info for small business owners. Click here to find
> > great products geared for your business.
> > Small Business Tools
> > http://tagline.excite.com/fc/FgElN1gzL0msQf4IXkGZMTpN8mDLwtkoBsH4U2aauVMKMZZGwXXYG25ASac/