Re: [CR] restoration and originality - philosophical test

(Example: Framebuilders:Pino Morroni)

Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 07:38:10 -0700
From: "Thomas Adams" <thomasthomasa@yahoo.com>
To: "classicrendezvous@bikelist.org" <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>, Mark Lawrence <mark.lawrence@firstreadthis.com>
In-Reply-To: <C1A9A0C6939C944F9486C72F7F253439B10B8B3B85@PEMEXMBXVS01.jellyfishnet.co.uk.local>
Subject: Re: [CR] restoration and originality - philosophical test


1990.  Paint is the least important factor on a frame, and that's the only thing being done in 2009.  Parts are designed to be replaced, so assembly time is also not relevant.  Norm Taylor's skill is designing and assembling the frame are of paramount importance, and that was done in 1990. 

Tom Adams
Manhattan, KS USA


--- On Tue, 7/21/09, Mark Lawrence wrote:


From: Mark Lawrence <mark.lawrence@firstreadthis.com> Subject: [CR] restoration and originality - philosophical test To: "classicrendezvous@bikelist.org" <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org> Date: Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 7:47 AM

I have an NOS Jack Taylor frame, that has never been painted.

It was built in 1990, covered in a primer coat by the Taylors and then put into storage when the factory closed.

It's now in my possession.   I'm having it painted.

This may sound like a silly question, but I thought it would focus the philosophers.

When I have it built up, should it be a 1990 bicycle?  Or a 2009 bicycle?

Mark Lawrence
Oxford
United Kingdom