Re: [CR] Falcon Professional (and yes, Reynolds 531 IS lighter than Columbus!)

(Example: Production Builders:Frejus)

Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:50:15 +0000 (UTC)
From: "damien roohr" <droohr@comcast.net>
To: Hilary Stone <hilary.stone@blueyonder.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <1905510074.13723261271710127470.JavaMail.root@sz0151a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net>
Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR] Falcon Professional (and yes, Reynolds 531 IS lighter than Columbus!)


Hilary -

Could you tell me what you suspect was used on a 25-inch Comp GS, 1978? Might the gauge vary by tube: main frame vs. stays vs fork blades?

thank you

Damien Roohr
Canton, CT


----- Original Message -----
From: Hilary Stone
To: Jon Spangler
Cc: Charles Colerich , Dale Brown
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 4:35:14 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [CR] Falcon Professional (and yes, Reynolds 531 IS lighter than Columbus!)


British builders far more often used 0.6/0.9 531 (which is sometimes described by Reynolds as 0.55/0.9) - except on the largest frames - 23.5in and larger. 0.7/1.0 is quite rare on British built 531 frames from all periods...

Hilary Stone, Bristol, British Isles

Jon Spangler wrote:
> Charles,
>
> I am absolutely certain that Reynolds 531 7/10 gauge tubing is lighter than Columbus SP tubing in 7/10 gauge.
> Forever. No matter what the scales read. Because God made Reynolds tubing and the Devil made Columbus...
>
> Jon Spangler
> a metric Reynolds partisan to the death in Alameda, CA USA :-)
>
>
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 01:42:31 -0700
> From: verktyg <verktyg@aol.com>
> Subject: Re: [CR] Falcon Professional
> To: Bill Roberts <bill.roberts@earthlink.net>,
> Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> Message-ID: <4BCC1777.7050109@aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Another point that I mentioned before, there was always an urban bicycle
> myth that Reynolds 531 tubing was lighter than Columbus (SP) tubing.
>
> Many production bikes built from the early 70s through the early 80s
> used Reynolds 531 7/10 wall thickness tubing.
>
> That's the same 7/10 wall thickness as Columbus SP tubing!
>
> The links below show some pages from the 1980 Gitane catalog for their
> top of the line Olympic model. The spec sheet is in French but you can
> see the 7/10 reference:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/y58b7vx
> http://tinyurl.com/y4r87yf
>
>
> What I've heard over the years was that back in the day a pro racer only
> had 1 or 2 bikes for the whole season; they were usually made out of
> heavier gage tubing to survive crashes and handling abuse between stages.
>
> Another factor, an economic one, I suspect that many bike manufactures
> used heavier gage tubing in their production bikes because they could
> employ less skilled workers to braze up the frames thus work faster.
> Also these frames were less likely to get dented during the
> manufacturing process.
>
> Chas. Colerich
> Oakland, CA USA
>
> Bill Roberts wrote:
>> Interesting post Chas, thanks.
>>
>> Regarding it being a somewhat common build trick to use the thicker wall
>> Reynolds 531 seat tubes in 70's English bikes. Many 70's Ron Coopers indeed
>> seem to be this way (27.0 post), in sizes 58c and larger. Versus a 27.2 in
>> 57c and below. Sheldon Brown agreed this was intentional (tubing
>> selection). I've noticed this on several of Ron's frames. With Ron being
>> very meticulous in both design and execution, I expect it is intentional,
>> and the thicker tube was used.
>>
>>
>> Bill Roberts
>> Jacksonville, Oregon USA
>
> Jon Spangler
> Writer/editor
> Linda Hudson Writing
> TEL 510-864-2144
> CEL 510-846-5356
> JonSwriter@att.net
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/jonmspangler
> http://www.twitter.com/jonmspangler