Re: [CR] If 36-spoke wheels are stronger than 32s, and 40s are stronger than 36s...

(Example: Humor:John Pergolizzi)

From: "David Snyder" <dddd@pacbell.net>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <763112828.1273538774579.JavaMail.SYSTEM@sj-wh04-003x1d3> <5408EC87-8CEB-4BAD-A92C-7BE24414CFD1@att.net>
In-Reply-To: <5408EC87-8CEB-4BAD-A92C-7BE24414CFD1@att.net>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 19:16:51 -0700
Subject: Re: [CR] If 36-spoke wheels are stronger than 32s, and 40s are stronger than 36s...


Most such wheels are built only for show 'n style, not performance. Likely they are tensioned off of the tops of the nipple using a screwdriver, perhaps a socket depending on the nipples used. If you build a full-radial rear wheel, better be using a hundred-plus spokes!

David Snyder
Auburn, CA usa


----- Original Message -----


Subject: [CR] If 36-spoke wheels are stronger than 32s,and 40s are stronger than 36s...


> Listers,
>
> There has been frequent debate over the relative desirability of more
> spokes versus fewer spokes per wheel
> in the CR community. Has anyone ever seen an on-topic wheel with anything
> like this many spokes?
>
> I know of 48s but that is as far up as I have seen any 700C, 27", or
> similar-diameter wheels go in
> the number of spokes. Seeing a 20" wheel with 144 spokes makes me wonder
> how a spoke wrench or fingers
> fit between the spokes....

>

> Jon