Re: [CR] Campy Racing Triple (1975)

(Example: Racing)

In-Reply-To: <92fcb.2a3b005a.3935b37f@aol.com>
References: <92fcb.2a3b005a.3935b37f@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 18:12:34 -0700
From: "Jim Merz" <jameshmerz@gmail.com>
To: FujiFish1@aol.com
Cc: Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR] Campy Racing Triple (1975)


No problem.

Jim Merz Big Sur CA

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 5:51 PM, <FujiFish1@aol.com> wrote:
> Isn't that just a standard 144 bcd double with extra long ring bolts and a
> third ring mounted on the inside with no support shelves? I'm curious ...
> how would that handle the load of a mountain climb? Seems like it
> wouldn't be long before the bolts began tweaking and the chainline getting
> thrown
> off.
>
> Ciao,
> Mark Agree
> Southfield, Michigan, USA
> ~ ~ ~
>
>
>
> Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 16:59:41 -0400
> From: rdf1249@aol.com
> Subject: [CR] Campy Racing Triple
> To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
>
>
> Here is what they used to call a racing triple:
>
>
> http://ebay.com/<blah>
>
> 01.m203&_trkparms=algo%3DCRX%26itu%3DLA%252BLM%252BUA%252BSI%26otn%3D4&ssPag
> eName=ADME:L:OU:US:1348<http://ebay.com/<blah>
>
> He mentions it is32-42-52 but I count 42-46-52. Seems unnecessary.
>
>
> Bob Freeman
> Elliott Bay Bicycles
> 2116 Western Ave
> Seattle, WA 98121
> 206-441-8144
> http://www.elliottbaybicycles.com
> http://www.davidsonbicycles.com