Re: [CR] Campy Racing Triple

(Example: Events:Cirque du Cyclisme:2007)

Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 02:36:09 +0000 (UTC)
From: <joeb-z@comcast.net>
To: Andrew R Stewart <onetenth@earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <44E959D309474722B8D6A7D22AA6BE77@ARSPC>
Cc: rdf1249@aol.com, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR] Campy Racing Triple


So how would you lay out a freewheel to take advantage of this crank? My guess is that the overlaps would defeat the purpose.

Actually, I think that combo will be particularly ugly .

Joe Bender-Zanoni
Whitneyville, CT


----- Original Message -----
From: Andrew R Stewart
To: haxixe@gmail.com, rdf1249@aol.com
Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 7:24:15 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [CR] Campy Racing Triple


If the goal with a triple crank is to achieve lower gears then this one doesn't get you there. If on the other hand it is to get closer ratios then this one is spot on.


----- Original Message -----
From: Kurt Sperry
To: rdf1249@aol.com
Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: [CR] Campy Racing Triple


On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:59 PM, <rdf1249@aol.com> wrote:
>
> Here is what they used to call a racing triple:
>
> http://ebay.com/<blah>
>
> He mentions it is32-42-52 but I count 42-46-52. Seems unnecessary.

Yep, can't be a 32 with a 144 BCD. In fact I can't see the point of a 144 BCD triple at all, but honestly there's not a lot of downside either. It could be worse, it could be a 151 BCD triple:

http://tinyurl.com/151-triple

Kurt Sperry Bellingham, Washington USA _______________________________________________

Andrew R Stewart
Rochester, NY