Re: [CR] (CR) It seams so unbelievable

(Example: Production Builders)

Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 19:27:43 -0700
In-Reply-To: <4C26AF11.5020309@os2.dhs.org>
Thread-Topic: [CR] (CR) It seams so unbelievable
Thread-Index: AcsVm4uf29CJ9Pg/TzyoJ90h8PNkPgAAvhtg
References: <81CC8569759D49DDB63FF06F14CB8CCD@GREER> <9327C3B25BD3C34A8DBC26145D88A9071732AA@hippy.home.here>
From: "Mark Bulgier" <Mark@bulgier.net>
To: <john@os2.dhs.org>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: Re: [CR] (CR) It seams so unbelievable


I wrote, somewhat inflammatorily (is that a word?):
> > If the tube decal says "Guaranteed built with Reynolds 531 butted
> > tubes, forks and stays", and it came from the factory with a Tange
> > fork, well that may be considered "normal" by some, but it is
> > FRAUD. Tange made good tubing, nothing wrong with it, but if Trek
> > said it was Reynolds, then they lied.

John Thompson replied
> Tange would build whatever the customer wanted, provided the order
> was large enough. Trek did have Reynolds 531 rear stays and fork
> components shipped to Japan to be brazed into sub-assemblies by
> Tange (and Ishiwata), that were then shipped to Waterloo for final
> assembly and painting.

Thanks for that cool insider info John, and I apologize to Trek, Trek workers, Trek bike owners and fans for my overly harsh words. I meant "If Trek said Tange tubing was Reynolds, then they lied". It never occurred to me that Tange would build forks out of Reynolds tubing, but I should have been more careful.

Mark Bulgier
Seattle, WA USA