Re: [CR] Gimme something metalurgico-scientifico

(Example: Framebuilders:Doug Fattic)

Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 19:23:42 -0800 (PST)
From: "Joe Starck" <josephbstarck@yahoo.com>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR] Gimme something metalurgico-scientifico


> If you can solve 1, we'll find the money for 2.

Merz & Heine,

What's the proposition(s), vs carbon fiber, for a sub-15 lb bike with a steel frame if the steel frame to be tested is bi-lam?:

"The Claud Butler bi-laminated bronze-welded frames* were lab tested in their day and were proved to be stronger than any other cycle frame comstruction method."  -Derek Athey

Joe Starck
Madison, Wisconsin USA


--- On Tue, 11/2/10, Jan Heine wrote:


> From: Jan Heine <heine94@earthlink.net>

\r?\n> Subject: Re: [CR] Gimme something metalurgico-scientifico

\r?\n> To: "Jim Merz" <jameshmerz@gmail.com>, "Harry Travis" <travis.harry@gmail.com>

\r?\n> Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org, bsandel@verizon.net, "Dave Porter" <frogeye@porterscustom.com>

\r?\n> Date: Tuesday, November 2, 2010, 3:47 PM

\r?\n> At 12:27 PM -0700 11/2/10, Jim Merz

\r?\n> wrote:

\r?\n>

\r?\n> > I had an idea to end this debate. How about we take a

\r?\n> steel frame like you

\r?\n> > are talking about and I will get the test lab to run

\r?\n> it through the tests

\r?\n> > that current frames have to pass. The problem with

\r?\n> this is:

\r?\n> >

\r?\n> > 1) Any builder that supplies the frame is not going to

\r?\n> be super keen on

\r?\n> > seeing a poor result.

\r?\n>

\r?\n> The bigger problem is what we are testing. I don't think

\r?\n> anybody really knows what makes a great bike. I am not even

\r?\n> sure riders can agree what makes a great bike. So how can

\r?\n> you test for something you cannot define? Sure, we can test

\r?\n> weight, or lateral stiffness, or dent resistance, but who

\r?\n> cares? Measuring is the easy part, but designing meaningful

\r?\n> tests is harder.

\r?\n>

\r?\n> Even the fatigue tests that companies now do to predict

\r?\n> failures offer only a poor prediction of real-world loads.

\r?\n> That is why you see so many recalls of bike components that

\r?\n> _presumably_ passed the tests with flying colors. On the

\r?\n> other hand, the bike industry engineers tell me their

\r?\n> frustrations with tests that make them beef up components in

\r?\n> places where they never have failed before, just to pass the

\r?\n> tests.

\r?\n>

\r?\n> > 2) How is the cost going to be dealt with?

\r?\n>

\r?\n> If you can solve 1, we'll find the money for 2.

\r?\n>

\r?\n> Jan Heine

\r?\n> Editor

\r?\n> Bicycle Quarterly

\r?\n> 2116 Western Ave.

\r?\n> Seattle WA 98121

\r?\n> http://www.vintagebicyclepress.com

\r?\n>

\r?\n> Follow our blog at http://janheine.wordpress.com/