Re: [CR]Pinnicle of the vintage lightweight era?

(Example: Framebuilders:Norman Taylor)

Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:41:53 -0800
From: "John D" <bikehunt@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]Pinnicle of the vintage lightweight era?
To: Brandon Ives <monkey37@bluemarble.net>, Doland.Cheung@sce.com
Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
References: <Pine.GSO.4.20.0103231313080.28104-100000@comet.bluemarble.net>


. "Except in my opinion classic bikes are
> generally before 1960, anything after is really contempary."

OK, Monkeyman. I don't necessarily agree or disagree, but I do think that your opinion calls for your definition of a "classic bike". Or definition of "classic" anything?? Or "vintage"? On what are you basing your opinion?

John Dunn in Napa Valley


----- Original Message -----
From: Brandon Ives
To: Doland.Cheung@sce.com
Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: [CR]Pinnicle of the vintage lightweight era?



> I'm not going to try to work my way into this can of worms that always
> ends up with people pissed off. Except in my opinion classic bikes are
> generally before 1960, anything after is really contempary. Your opinion
> may vary and you're intitled to it.
>
> enjoy,
> monkeyman aka TheManMonkey (a new one that's a Kraftwerk reference) aka
> (and to the IRS) Brandon Ives
> overcast and cool southers Calif.
>
> "Nobody can do everything, but if everybody did something everything would
> get done." Gil Scott-Heron