Re: [CR] Who has trouble stopping with vintage sidepulls?

(Example: Framebuilding:Restoration)

In-Reply-To: <a0623095ec59cfa6383a9@[192.168.1.33]>
References: <A1370A275A064D648680E850E51B5BB5@AD.UCSD.EDU> <75d04b480901201815u43052401y8447c1be65cc9cd@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Phil Brown" <philcycles@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:36:12 -0800
To: classic rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Subject: Re: [CR] Who has trouble stopping with vintage sidepulls?


I haven't chimed in on this but what the hey, here I go. Flex it the enemy of braking. Older brakes compensated for this in a couple of ways but the most important was pad softness. Older pads were softer-cf: MAFAC-to follow the rim as the caliper flexed. Weinmann and Universal were the same. Remember how fast those pads wore out? In comes Campy with about the stiffest calipers made to the time. But they paired them with the hardest pads we'd ever seen. Remember how every ride was followed by a session picking aluminum flakes out of the pads? This was the "speed modulation" theory. Of course those non pelotonists among us needed to actually stop and hated picking our rims out of the pads so guess what? We switched to Scott Mathauser pads as soon as they came out. Viola! Braking problems solved. The problem is that modern pads are harder than vintage pads. Even if they are vintage pads they've hardened over the past 20 or 30 years on the bike shop shelf so now we have the worst of all possible worlds: flexy calipers with hard pads and poor stopping. I hope this brings some new thought to the discussion.
Phil Brown
Berkeley, Calif.